Juegos didácticos con inteligencia artificial: transformando la táctica deportiva desde el silbato al algoritmo
Abstract
The integration and collaboration of emerging technologies in physical education represent both a challenge and an opportunity to transform traditional pedagogical practices. This study aimed to analyze the design process of educational games mediated by generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, specifically Gemini and Canva Code, within the context of sports training. A qualitative approach with a descriptive-exploratory design was implemented. A co-creation workshop was conducted with professors and students, where participants at the Mexico-Colombia international agreement conference utilized prompt engineering to build recreational-educational resources aimed at developing tactical thinking and spatial memory. The findings demonstrate that AI does not replace the teacher; instead, it acts as a "creative co-pilot" that enhances the ability to design complex cognitive environments. Furthermore, the research validated a reproducible four-phase technical pathway based on the Role + Context + Task + Format structure, facilitating techno-pedagogical autonomy in the classroom. It is concluded that the ethical and pedagogically grounded use of these tools democratizes the creation of analytical resources in sports, increasing student motivation and engagement. These results highlight the relevance of transitioning from traditional methods toward a "Smart PE" model, where technology empowers decision-making and real-time feedback.
References
An, Y., & James, S. (2025). Generative AI integration in K-12 settings: Teachers' perceptions and levels of integration. TechTrends, 69(3), 1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01130-9
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Chen, L., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence–assisted physical education: Adaptive learning and performance feedback. Computers & Education, 189, 104596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104596
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332.
Kao, C. C. (2020). The effects of gamification on physical education students' learning motivation and engagement. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(4), 512-521. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0212
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.
Lee, H. S. (2021). Chatbot-assisted learning of sports rules in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(3), 456-465. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0158
Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2009). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Some concerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28(2), 220-240. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.28.2.220
Memmert, D., & Perl, J. (2015). Game creativity: Theory and practice in team sports. Meyer & Meyer Sport.
Palao, J. M., et al. (2022). Virtual reality applications in tactical sports training: A systematic review. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 41(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2021-0123
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Pérez-López, I. J., et al. (2021). Gamification in physical education: A systematic review. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(1), 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0256
Qian, Y. (2025). Prompt engineering in education: A systematic review of approaches and educational applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(7-8), 1782-1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251320654
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Scherer, R., et al. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Serra, P., & Oliveira, Â. (2025). AI-powered prompt engineering for education 4.0: Transforming digital resources into engaging learning experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1897-1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13145-2
White, J., et al. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mags. Felipe Hernandez, Dr. José Ozuna, Mgs. Marco Ledezma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
La revista Movimiento y Desarrollo de la Pedagogía y Educación Física se publica bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Los autores tienen el Movimiento y Desarrollo de la Pedagogía y Educación Física en repositorios institucionales o personales, en su sitio web, o en cualquier otra plataforma de libre acceso, siempre y cuando se mantenga la atribución correspondiente y se indique que el trabajo fue publicado originalmente en Movimiento y Desarrollo de la Pedagogía y Educación Física.
Los autores pueden entrar en acuerdos contractuales adicionales no exclusivos para la distribución no exclusiva del trabajo publicado en esta revista, siempre y cuando se mantenga la atribución correspondiente al primer lugar de publicación.
La revista Movimiento y Desarrollo de la Pedagogía y Educación Física, sigue una política de acceso abierto, lo que significa que todo el contenido está disponible de manera gratuita y sin restricciones para el usuario o su institución. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar los textos completos de los artículos o utilizarlos para cualquier otro propósito lícito, sin pedir permiso previo del editor o del autor.
Los autores son responsables de garantizar que sus trabajos no infringen los derechos de autor ni los derechos de terceros. La revista no se hace responsable de posibles infracciones de derechos de autor que puedan derivarse de la publicación de los artículos.
Los datos publicados en la revista pueden ser reutilizados libremente por terceros, siempre que se respete la licencia bajo la cual se publicó el trabajo original y se mantenga la atribución adecuada.
La revista Movimiento y Desarrollo de la Pedagogía y Educación Física se reserva el derecho de modificar estos términos de licencia en cualquier momento, con aviso previo a los autores y lectores. Las nuevas condiciones no serán retroactivas y no afectarán las licencias de los artículos ya publicados.
